The Institutional Risk Analyst

People in the private credit trade will tell you that raising new money is almost impossible. Why? Because there are growing signs of contagion in the insurance sector after years of dubious business practices by insurers controlled by private credit firms. As details of some of these situations emerge, we suspect that the mainstream media will become more engaged.

What it says to me is every institutional portfolio has to think about holding some gold, if they want to protect themselves against extremes of default risk, some allocation permanently to gold. Now, should it be 3% or 4% or 5%? I don’t know. We can do what the europeans are doing and go 50% into non-dollar assets. In other words, we are in dollars. So, the only way to address US default risk is for us to own gold or something else. Because for us to own the CDS in dollars

In the second quarter of 2026, Morgan Stanley’s margin and other lending balances increased by $3.0 billion (or 9%) sequentially compared to the first quarter. Year-over-year, these loan balances surged by $10.3 billion (or 40%).

One reason that we believe that consumer loss rates are so low is that more aggressive lenders like HAPN and many others are ready and willing to provide unsecured financing to consumers. Given the signs of stress we see building in the private residential loan channel, we'd be more inclined to take the short side of HAPN -- especially if they are so anxious to take risk in home improvement lending.

Len Tannenbaum, founder of Tannenbaum Capital, told Bloomberg's Carrol Massar that some BDCs could buckle as the pressure mounts, depending on how leveraged they are, their overall exposure to troubled loans and “how long they’ve swept things under the rug” using such methods as "payment in kind" or PIK to avoid default. “PIK is POOP — Principal On Outstanding Principal — and it doesn’t matter how much, POOP smells,” Tannenbaum said.

Consumers and policy makers will probably be surprised to learn how imprecise the world of aggregating consumer data remains in 2026, almost 40 years since the first standardized consumer credit score, known as the FICO Score, was published in the United States in 1989. The fact that several new scores have been published by the aggregators of consumer data has not improved the situation appreciably. How can the consumer finance industry and the regulatory agencies get this r

The major Wall Street investment firms tracked by the WGA Bank Top 50 followed the industry trend and reported lower credit costs in Q1 2026. Income was higher due to the brisk activity in the capital markets in the first three months of the year, but asset returns and funding costs fell significantly. We suspect that both trends will be partially reversed in Q2 2026 results and very visible in 2H 2026. Suffice to see that Elon Musk was lucky indeed to get his IPO for SpaceX

In Q1 2026, the top seven banks continued to see asset returns decline, but funding costs fell even more. Net interest margin (NIM) decreased from the prior quarter to 3.31 percent, but loan growth driven by AI nonbank lending continued, rising 7.1 percent from the same quarter in 2025.

“One reason why bank credit statistics look so good is that the markets remain awash in liquidity, forcing asset prices up and default rates down,” notes Whalen. "We estimate that there are now $3 trillion in unused loan commitments to non-depository financial institutions."

Meanwhile, Michael Saylor, Executive Chairman of Strategy (MSTR), f/k/a MicroStrategy, stated that the company will "probably sell some Bitcoin" to fund dividends and "inoculate the market," after the firm (now holding hundreds of thousands of coins) faced consecutive quarterly losses. This change marks a stark reversal in Saylor’s public position regarding the value of bitcoin.

Of course, in the muddled markets at present, there are a number of low-scoring banks which have done relatively well in recent weeks. The parent company of tiny Merchants Bank of Indiana, Merchants Bancorp (MBIN), for example, saw its stock price rise significantly in early 2026, 2x the S&P 500 over the past year, driven primarily by its inclusion in a major index and strong financial performance.

“Private debt” gating retail investors is the whipping boy du jour, but not the canary in the coal mine, nor the real problem, nor the real risk. Over-investment and malinvestment in things like data centers or unprofitable business models that require cheap money and are based on hype and suspension of common sense, excessive government spending, inflation and currency debasement, populism and socialist rhetoric manifesting itself in real policy and tax decisions, these are

As we noted in our discussion with Julie Hyman on Yahoo Finance this week, the big question facing banks in Q1 2026 is disclosure about private credit. The big losers in private credit are not banks, but rather institutional and retail investors who were lured into these wholly unsuitable, structurally illiquid investments by the false public statements made by the sponsors.

The average of non-interest income to assets for the more than 100 large banks in Peer Group One is 1% of assets. AXP’s non-interest income was equal to 18% of total assets at the end of 2025, putting the $290 billion asset bank in the 99th percentile of all US banks based on this measure. Add this to astute management and high asset turns and AXP is the premier bank in the US based upon market valuation.

We infer the size of the NDFI portfolio of individual banks by subtracting the aggregate NDFI series of the FDIC from Other Loans & Leases. In 2010 when the FDIC first started gathering the data, NDFI loans were less than a quarter of the “other loans and leases” (OLL) category, but today they are 60% of OLL and growing fast.

As we told Daniela Cambone last week, the collapse of private equity and credit could be one of the biggest busts we've ever seen on Wall Street. Why? Because the world of private equity and credit is entirely illiquid, something that retail and even institutional investors cannot tolerate in times of market stress.

APO CEO Marc Rowan has argued that private markets are superior to public markets due to consistent excess returns (1.5% higher annually), better diversification, and lower risk than traditionally assumed. The debacle around OWL and other examples suggests that Rowan is mistaken and that public markets are superior to private schemes.

Tech bellwether Nvidia (NVDA) dropped dramatically last week, but less than the stock had fallen in January or in December of last year. Cisco Systems (CSCO) tumbled 11%–12.3% on a downbeat outlook, making it one of the largest single-day drops last week. Microsoft (MSFT) is down 20% since January due to investor fatigue over the absurd AI narrative. Are these stocks a buy on the bounce?

The good news is that Webster is not a bad bank and SAN is not overpaying, although the low level of capital and reserves may represent be a significant expense for SAN in the near term. We kind of liked the fact that SAN’s management team had avoided another bank acquisition and instead focused on consumer finance...

But more to the point, the comingled worlds of private equity and credit may be the biggest scandal to hit Wall Street in a century. Most bank loans to PE sponsors "secured" by private company assets are actually non-recourse, so there is no recovery for the bank in the event of default. We think these factors are just some of the reasons that exposures to private equity and credit may be the most risky part of bank loan portfolios.