The Institutional Risk Analyst

“Since the start of the Iran war, base rates are up 48 bps and spreads (the six rates I use) are up 80 bps, for a total impact of 128 bps. The impact on EBITDA to support equity is roughly $5 billion per bp. At an EBITDA multiple of 8-1, each bp reduces equity valuations by $40 billion. SIMPLY STATED, the “cost” of the war now stands at $5.12 trillion in reduced “fair value” of US investments. ARE WE HAVING FUN YET?”

As of December 31, 2025, Athene had the ability to draw up to an estimated $30.7 billion via advances, inclusive of borrowings then outstanding. But when the funding agreements are added, the total exposure to the FHLBs from APO is over $50 billion vs $74 billion in total capital and retained earnings for the FHLB system.

Within a couple of months, the supplies of crucial petrochemical inputs currently on the water will be delivered and there will be nothing in the delivery pipeline after that point in time. Refined products are a far greater concern than oil. Kuwait, for example, produces a lot of aviation fuel for the EU. The Saudis are now shipping phosphates by truck to Yanbu, but this is not even a modest replacement for the disrupted supply chain in the Gulf.

The year 2025 was another year of magical thinking ℅ Donald Trump, a man whose mere presence in the room causes everyone else to descend to their most base level. Trump came to Washington as a president who spurned convention and embraced crypto currencies. He rejected New Deal regulation and encouraging greed and self-interest in a way not seen since the years following the Civil War. The impact on financial markets is profound and may continue for some time.

Institutional investors can and do abide by limits on redemptions for private equity and credit, at least for a while. Retail investors cannot and do not, and will run when there are clear signs of distress and illiquidity. Remember the deposit run at Silicon Valley Bank.

APO CEO Marc Rowan has argued that private markets are superior to public markets due to consistent excess returns (1.5% higher annually), better diversification, and lower risk than traditionally assumed. The debacle around OWL and other examples suggests that Rowan is mistaken and that public markets are superior to private schemes.

The surprise pre-release of Q4 results led to a significant drop in JPMorgan's stock price and took down the entire sector along with it. But is this the only negative surprise likely to come from JPM? We think not. CNBC’s Jim Cramer said on X yesterday that investors should buy JPM on the dip, but we disagree. In fact, the markets seem to know something about JPM. Maybe this explains why Citigroup (C) has outperformed the House of Morgan all year.

As we have said consistently, it is better to own the shares of stronger crypto enablers like HOOD and SOFI than the tokens themselves. It is the enablers who profit at the expense of the remaining true greater. We were watching a fascinating conversation with independent technology analyst and advisor Benedict Evans earlier this week and he made the point that serious technologists have largely abandoned crypto as an area of study.

Most public companies are so invested in the false gospel of AI that they dare not even hint at the truth, namely that the vast majority of AI projects will never be profitable or even relevant. As LeCun notes, consumers will benefit from more robust search tools, but the AI that emerges in the next decade will be too feeble and too fallible to be deployed by business. Recall the costly fiasco of the early AI charade called "Watson" from IBM.

The proliferation of low- or no-cost coin systems is ultimately negative for established players in nonbank finance and payments, including the major card issuers, as we discuss below. Still worried about interchange fees?

We think it is notable that AMP has underperformed the other members of the group other than SCHW over the past year.

The rotation away from institutional investors to retail funding source for the $1.7 trillion direct lending market is an ominous sign

Direct lenders are the pawnbrokers of the 21st Century for subprime commercial borrowers, usually firms financed via leveraged buyouts.